Page 1 of 1

ADR approved braided brake lines (regulations)

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:03 am
by whitenight
The new regulation is..

ADR 42 - General Safety Requirements
The function of this Australian Design Rule is to specify design and construction requirements to ensure safe operation of vehicles.
Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 42/04 ?
General Safety Requirements) 2005
Compilation: 1 (up to and including Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule
42/04 ? General Safety Requirements) 2005 Amendment 1)
Compilation Date: 12th October 2007
Compiled by: Vehicle Safety Standards, Department of Transport and Regional
Services

15. BRAKE TUBING AND BRAKE HOSE
Flexible hydraulic brake hoses, air or vacuum brake tubing and air and
vacuum hose, flexible and hydraulic power hose between the Brake
Power Unit 31/00 or Brake Power Unit 35/00 and the master cylinder
or its equivalent must conform to SAA, SAE, BS, JIS, DIN, ISO or ECE
Standards specified for flexible brake hoses, air brake tubing or hose or
vacuum brake tubing or hose or hydraulic power tubing or hose and be
fitted to the vehicle as to prevent chafing, kinking or other mechanical
damage under normal motion of the parts to which they are attached.
So basically, anything which comes from one of the reputable manufacturers i.e. Goodridge, AP etc, will be ADR approved. I'm not sure of any other manufacturer unless they specify that they are built to one of the above standards, but I'd hazard a guess many would be.

To simplify it.. any braided line must fall under one of the other world standards to be ADR approved.

Hope this helps

found this on another car forum

i bought some works braided brake lines which are D.O.T approved in the states
D.O.T = department of transport
same regulations as over here so hopefully that they will be adr approved as well.

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:56 am
by SAM-24A
Hey Ken.

I had a pair of Braided Brake Lines made-up according to my provided samples for the RA Front Callipers I recently purchased.

Brand: BrakeQiup provided by an Australian Company named: Braided Hoses.com.au

Manufactured By: Pirtek

Compliance: ADR (Aust Design Rule) 42/04. (read 2nd paragraph)

Each braidedhoses.com.au manufacturer will make your brake hoses using genuine BrakeQuip components only.
Every manufacturer recommended in this web site is registered with BrakeQuip and have been issued a Compliance Certificate as proof of their commitment to product and service.


Sam :wink:

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:17 am
by SAM-24A
Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 42/04 – General Safety Requirements) 2005


Link: ADR 42/04

Part 15 -- BRAKE TUBING AND BRAKE HOSE.
Flexible hydraulic brake hoses, air or vacuum brake tubing and air and vacuum hose, flexible and hydraulic power hose between the ‘Brake Power Unit 31/00’ or ‘Brake Power Unit 35/00’
and the master cylinder or its equivalent must conform to SAA, SAE, BS, JIS, DIN, ISO or ECE Standards, or FMVSS 106 Brake Hoses,
specified for flexible brake hoses, air brake tubing or hose or vacuum brake tubing or hose or hydraulic power tubing or hose and be fitted to the vehicle as to prevent chafing,
kinking or other mechanical damage under normal motion of the parts to which they are attached.




Sam :wink:

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:24 am
by whitenight
so aslong there is no chaffing or kinking it will be fine ?

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:48 am
by SAM-24A
Hey Ken,
You asked in the chat about DOT.
All I can find of any significance on DOT so far is: FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS -- U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Standards Rule No: 106 -- Brake Hoses.

Sam. :wink:

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:20 pm
by whitenight
found this


I did a bit of a google and came across this comment, so best do your research. By the way, they also went on to say that Goodridge do have ADR approval.

Note: The Federation Of Road Safety (FORS) warns that many brake hoses say they comply with the American standards FMVS1O6, however that does not mean that also meet ADR requirements. The FORS state that many hoses have been submitted with the American approval but have failed under Australian Design Rule. This point must be stressed to customers when inquiring about true street legal brake lines.

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:21 am
by SAM-24A
SAM-24A wrote:Hey Ken.

I had a pair of Braided Brake Lines made-up according to my provided samples for the RA Front Callipers I recently purchased.

Brand: BrakeQiup provided by an Australian Company named: Braided Hoses.com.au

Manufactured By: Pirtek

Compliance: ADR (Aust Design Rule) 42/04. (read 2nd paragraph)

Each braidedhoses.com.au manufacturer will make your brake hoses using genuine BrakeQuip components only.
Every manufacturer recommended in this web site is registered with BrakeQuip and have been issued a Compliance Certificate as proof of their commitment to product and service.


Sam :wink:



Here they are:
Image....Image


Sam.... :wink:

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 1:16 pm
by El-Diablo
SAM-24A wrote:Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 42/04 – General Safety Requirements) 2005


Link: ADR 42/04

Part 15 -- BRAKE TUBING AND BRAKE HOSE.
Flexible hydraulic brake hoses, air or vacuum brake tubing and air and vacuum hose, flexible and hydraulic power hose between the ‘Brake Power Unit 31/00’ or ‘Brake Power Unit 35/00’
and the master cylinder or its equivalent must conform to SAA, SAE, BS, JIS, DIN, ISO or ECE Standards, or FMVSS 106 Brake Hoses,
specified for flexible brake hoses, air brake tubing or hose or vacuum brake tubing or hose or hydraulic power tubing or hose and be fitted to the vehicle as to prevent chafing,
kinking or other mechanical damage under normal motion of the parts to which they are attached.


DOT aint on the list so DOT approved hoses without one or more of the other listed standards associations wouldn't be ADR compliant.

Sam :wink:

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 5:44 pm
by SAM-24A
Hi Rob.

I was confused & didn't understand your last post .... until I read the last line in the quote box:
DOT aint on the list so DOT approved hoses without one or more of the other listed standards associations wouldn't be ADR compliant.

This line was not in my original post.
So I guess that was your post message .... except that you placed it in my quote box by mistake.....lol.

Never mind.....we all get it a little wrong at times.
I know I do.....:lol:


Regards: Sam.... :wink:

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 6:53 pm
by El-Diablo
I'm Old and Senile LOL

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 6:54 pm
by SAM-24A
Join My Club......:lol:

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 6:58 pm
by LZY_EYE
Sam is el presidente of that club :mrgreen:

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:03 pm
by SAM-24A
No Quite Shane ..... we do have a more Senior Little Angel from up North .... but don't worry Doreen, I wont tell anyone.

And an Older Fart out West who is trying to re-live his childhood by racing around the Isle of Man atm, your secret is safe with me Ron.


HaHa....Sam.