***** ALERT - Nominations for your new ClubCJ Committee can be made here *****

VRX Manual vs CVT

Let Us Help You Decide What To Purchase.

Moderator: Senior Moderators

User avatar
Seffy
Lancer Legend
Lancer Legend
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:23 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Seffy » Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:54 pm

Eh, so long as the "gear shifting" hand is doing something, doesn't matter how it works since Chris is pretty happy with it.

But it's probably a good bit of info to know how the CVT works anyways in case it somewhat fails and whatnot.
Last edited by Seffy on Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Crayon Pop "straight-five engine" dance ftw.

Image

User avatar
shadow-vex
Lancer Evolution
Lancer Evolution
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 6:29 pm
Location: camden

Postby shadow-vex » Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:37 pm

well the thread is called manual vs cvt, so I simply stated how cvt works, u dnt need to start an argument erin
Image
Boost life scrambles the brain

User avatar
Seffy
Lancer Legend
Lancer Legend
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:23 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Seffy » Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:46 pm

Ok keep the thread on topic please.

Request to clean if necessary, Justin/Pete.
Crayon Pop "straight-five engine" dance ftw.



Image

User avatar
VRX_08
Genius
Genius
Posts: 8017
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 9:35 pm
Location: Northern Adelaide, South Australia

Postby VRX_08 » Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:54 pm

Both are fun to drive, although I still prefer my manual!

The CVT was fun in the hills of what I have driven one as you don't have to worry about the clutch like you do in manuals! The CVT is quicker off the mark from a stopping position although once the manual hits 3rd the manual reals in the CVT pretty quick again! :D

User avatar
blinklight
Lancer Evolution
Lancer Evolution
Posts: 916
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:26 pm
Location: Adelaide

Postby blinklight » Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:32 am

VRX_08 wrote:Both are fun to drive, although I still prefer my manual! The CVT was fun in the hills of what I have driven one as you dont have to worry about the clutch like you do in manuals! The CVT is quicker off the mark from a stopping position although once the manual hits 3rd the manual reals in the CVT pretty quick again! :D

Your not driving yours properly Andrew, if you can't beat an auto off the start :P
Annie's Merlinised Red Devil
Image

User avatar
Jason-VR
Lancer ES/EX
Lancer ES/EX
Posts: 165
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:48 am
Location: adelaide,SA

Postby Jason-VR » Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:06 am

TrojanHorse wrote:Not really, auto will usually beat manual off the start cause its instant accelleration.

WRONG. The CVT waits for the engine revs to pickup before before properly engaging.
Also the CVT is lower geared so it has a lot higher speed in first gear( belt position) then the manual.
Where the CVT is better/faster is once it is above 60km/h where it will hold the engine revs at the maximum power position.

User avatar
belle_tb_ES
Post Monster
Post Monster
Posts: 2614
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 11:39 am
Location: Hills District, NSW

Postby belle_tb_ES » Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:44 pm

I find that cvts are slower off the mark...
if you dump the clutch (is that the right term?) in a manual you have that head start
But CVTs seem to hit a point where you feel the extra power/boom if that makes sense. VrrrRROOOMMMM


I have a CVT and I don't mind it (never learnt how to drive a manual)

ive had no dramas with mine yet

There are obvious reasons such as : if you get stuck in traffic often, cvts will be a easier option
- if you want more fun then manual
- cvts can still sound nice with an exhaust..but you will always get that moooooo
PRESENT: 2015 Audi S3

PAST:2009 Lancer ES called Lancee...


Garage: http://clubcj.net/garage.php?mode=view_vehicle&CID=947
I

User avatar
belle_tb_ES
Post Monster
Post Monster
Posts: 2614
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 11:39 am
Location: Hills District, NSW

Postby belle_tb_ES » Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:58 pm

I guess I haven't put much effort into taking off fast....:p haha
PRESENT: 2015 Audi S3



PAST:2009 Lancer ES called Lancee...





Garage: http://clubcj.net/garage.php?mode=view_vehicle&CID=947

I

User avatar
SIX
Post Monster
Post Monster
Posts: 3251
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:44 pm
Location: Northern Adelaide

Postby SIX » Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:00 pm

VRX_08 wrote:Both are fun to drive, although I still prefer my manual! The CVT was fun in the hills of what I have driven one as you dont have to worry about the clutch like you do in manuals! The CVT is quicker off the mark from a stopping position although once the manual hits 3rd the manual reals in the CVT pretty quick again! :D
no way in hell dose a cvt beat me off the line .... chances are hell will freeze over before a cvt beats me lol
1998 MR lancer
2009 CJ lancer sportback
2011 Renault Sport RS250 Trophee Cup
2000 Tommi Makenin Evolution 6.5

User avatar
RyanMK
Lancer Legend
Lancer Legend
Posts: 1115
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:15 pm
Location: Adelaide

Postby RyanMK » Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:30 pm

I'll be frank here, just me thinking out loud.

I find it pretty hilarious when everyone here is debating 'how fast can I get my car off the line', when I'm pretty sure:
1. Nearly none of you track the car.
2. Most of us are usually stuck in 60km/h zones. and by the time you hit 60, it's time to slow down at the lights again.

Is it really that much of an importance?
VG/Ultra Racing/Whiteline/Work/Ralliart/Supercircuit/Cosworth/Pioneer/BC/Recaro


Return to “Thinking of Buying a Lancer?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests