***** ALERT - Nominations for your new ClubCJ Committee can be made here *****

*WARNING! You may vomit!! Paint scheme for CJ - too ricey

Design & Share Your Photochop Idea's & Images.

Moderators: Moderators, Senior Moderators

User avatar
Peanut
Lancer Ralliart
Lancer Ralliart
Posts: 691
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 10:55 am
Location: The Shire, NSW, Australia

Postby Peanut » Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:45 pm

Its not bad, alot going on
Look Out! in The Shire!!
Image
The Can Crusher, Tuckin' Rubber, Pancake Flat. - CCJ Premium Member #0022

bobcrusader wrote:
Blake, you must be a member of the fun police? Do you know my wife?

User avatar
Mizta B
Alumni
Alumni
Posts: 5867
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:29 am
Location: Mortdale, NSW, Australia

Postby Mizta B » Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:48 pm

No thanks
Too much happening there for me
I like a simpler design,that one is giving me vertigo LOL!
It is different though and original,I'll give you that mate! :mrgreen:
Australasian Gerbil Rearers Organisation, Official Re-Seller.
Image
MY09 Rally Red VRX ClubCJ's 1st 4B12 2.4L - CCJ Lifetime Member #0004.
Merlinised....

User avatar
Speedie
Lancer MASTER
Lancer MASTER
Posts: 1751
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:42 pm
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Postby Speedie » Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:21 pm

Looks like one of those ADD/westside custom cars getting around Brissy
Image

[Evo X Brembos] [Evo X Intercooler] [Evo X UICP]

User avatar
jolly_tas
Lancer Ralliart
Lancer Ralliart
Posts: 524
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:06 pm
Location: Launceston, Tas, Australia
Contact:

Postby jolly_tas » Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:46 pm

well i take it that its not a popular design! lol. had to laugh at the thread rename! lmao.
Image

User avatar
leevin
Lancer VRX/GTS
Lancer VRX/GTS
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:48 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Postby leevin » Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:20 am

you could enter that in autosalon? lol.
07 CJ VRX BLACK LANCER

User avatar
The X
INACTIVE Member Account
Posts: 6769
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:41 am
Location: Pyrmonia! Inner Sydney.
Contact:

Postby The X » Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:35 am

So much haterade being sipped on. :D
Must admit it looks like the typical paint job manufacturers put on test cars on test tracks to deter automotive photogs from seeing the precise lines on upcoming cars. LOLz.

However that being said, the above it a big meh. Though the idea has merit, it could be developed further into something a bit more appeasing and not something out of a 1980s flashback. :(
"the quieter you become, the more you are able to hear"
More pix @ http://clubcj.net/viewtopic.php?t=8779
ImageImage

User avatar
Bandit
Lancer Legend
Lancer Legend
Posts: 1170
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:56 am
Location: The People's Republic of Campbelltown

Postby Bandit » Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:40 am

I have always wanted to see a car done up in the WWI and WWII US Navy camouflage schemes - like in these photos.

Image

Image

Image
ClubCJ's first Sportback

User avatar
kinesis
Project Team Member
Posts: 778
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: QLD, Australia

Postby kinesis » Fri Dec 11, 2009 8:33 am

ofey wrote:God help us... .


there is no God...

User avatar
tadz0rz
Genius
Genius
Posts: 6955
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Contact:

Postby tadz0rz » Fri Dec 11, 2009 8:59 am

kinesis wrote:
there is no God...


+1
Got a question? Read the ClubCJ Ultimate Guide First!!
Image
Just...Dont worry about it ;)Dont Click Me

User avatar
Stoney
INACTIVE Member Account
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:49 am
Location: The "friend zone".

Postby Stoney » Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:30 am

Bandit wrote:I have always wanted to see a car done up in the WWI and WWII US Navy camouflage schemes - like in these photos.

How is that gonna help? I'd spot those easier than normal painted ships

camo like that only works in bushy regions, not in the middle of the ocean...
Charles Darwin was right. To achieve genetic perfection, you need Evolution.
----------------------------
Image

User avatar
Bandit
Lancer Legend
Lancer Legend
Posts: 1170
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:56 am
Location: The People's Republic of Campbelltown

Postby Bandit » Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:09 pm

It works as it distorts the ship's appearance on the horizon. These boats were done in the days before on-board ship radar was common. The lines and variation in colour assist in changing the ship's appearance on the horizon where it would have been viewed through the enemy's binoculars/rangefinder. The lines distort the vision of the ship, making identifying it (and therefore how many guns it carries) difficult as well as judging how far away the boat is.

Nowdays it would be useless.

As someone mentioned above, a similar technique is used to disguise car testing mules and prototypes on open road tests. It makes the edges and 'lines' of the car harder to discern.

Edit:

Added from from Wikipedia:

"At first glance it seems unlikely camouflage, drawing attention to the ship rather than hiding it, but this technique was developed after the Allied Navy's failure to develop effective means to disguise ships in all weather.

Dazzle did not conceal the ship but made it difficult for the enemy to estimate its type, size, speed and heading. The idea was to disrupt the visual rangefinders used for naval artillery. Its purpose was confusion rather than concealment.[1] An observer would find it difficult to know exactly whether the stern or the bow is in view; and it would be equally difficult to estimate whether the observed vessel is moving towards or away from the observer's position.[2]"
ClubCJ's first Sportback

User avatar
Stoney
INACTIVE Member Account
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:49 am
Location: The "friend zone".

Postby Stoney » Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:33 pm

hmmmm, that's actually a pretty smart idea, I didn't think of viewing it from far away, I just thought it wouldn't work if you were up close, which it won't.
Charles Darwin was right. To achieve genetic perfection, you need Evolution.

----------------------------

Image

SIR-VRX
Genius
Genius
Posts: 7244
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:16 pm
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Postby SIR-VRX » Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:45 pm

kinesis wrote:
ofey wrote:God help us... .


there is no God...


Thank God I am an atheist!!

User avatar
billyboy
Lancer Evolution
Lancer Evolution
Posts: 778
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:45 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby billyboy » Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:05 pm

Image

User avatar
The X
INACTIVE Member Account
Posts: 6769
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:41 am
Location: Pyrmonia! Inner Sydney.
Contact:

Postby The X » Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:20 pm

SIR-VRX wrote:
kinesis wrote:
ofey wrote:God help us... .


there is no God...


Thank God I am an atheist!!

+1 on that. :) Well agnostic, but almost same diff.
"the quieter you become, the more you are able to hear"

More pix @ http://clubcj.net/viewtopic.php?t=8779

ImageImage


Return to “Photochop Gallery”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests