Page 2 of 3
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 8:09 pm
yes scott, the majority of us enjoy this thread, and hope your endeavours pay off.
u must be spending a lot of cash?
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 8:17 pm
he bought a new one?, i missed that.
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 9:47 pm
He bought a Jeep...?
Oh, sorry - wrong ad...
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 1:07 am
good on you mate - interesting to see how it pans out
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 9:25 am
scott i hope it all pans out for you in the end.
is there an eta as to when this madness will end and you will have your final result???
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 6:16 am
R4LLI4RT wrote:scott i hope it all pans out for you in the end. is there an eta as to when this madness will end and you will have your final result???
Around the 12th would be my estimate
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:19 pm
no eta yet could be 2-5years until a FINAL outcome has been determined, we are constructing a 110% bullet proof case, we are working on every aspect on this car and case, and building the case with both fighting and defending points of view to make sure nothing has been missed and we proof everything beyond reasonable doubt, and have 100% SOLID FACTS
It is a very tricky case that requires nothing less that 100% accuracy and that takes time, and time is money
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 10:31 pm
Crowdsource it, you never know...
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:35 pm
I would love to know what you intend to get out of all of this. In 2 - 5 years this will be an obsolete platform, and given that the evo m and evo x forums are not reporting this issue I'm guessing it is not a manufacturing issue running through all evo x's.
Whilst you obviously have money you can throw at this (including buying a $60k new car for cash (says volumes how you throw that comment in) that is possibly defective by your reckoning) is it really going to be worth it? Really????
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:35 pm
Agreed Erin, and why would you spend so much money AGAIN on a car you claim has so many faults?????
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:58 am
this is coming from the one who is now selling her evo on carsales after not listening to me when buying the evo with HIGH KMS, now look what u can get for the money u got your evo for not that long ago, (i bet your kicking yourself now) .....
reason is becuase ccj has a BIGGER EVO 10 comunity than ozevo
ive already had 1 person from oz evo come to me about this issue, and others from ccj, and more from word of mouth on the streets ( i know ALLOT of people)
anyways, i refuse to waste my brain cells on ignorant and arrogant people like you erin, BYE!
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:53 am
guys tbh im finding this hard to swallow aswell.
the damage on the car can not be caused by a low speed accident (it just simply cant)
as for a ayc error or a cv joint issue again the damanged caused is too extreme.
BUT!! regardless of what measures scott is taking best of luck to him in with he believes.
its a shame to destroy a new car and if you do scott make sure you let us pick off the remains of it.
if this is going to take 2 -5 years then tbh no1 will care by then.